Abstract | BACKGROUND: OBJECTIVES: To study the efficacy of the 1-pulse dosing regimen of two generic products of itraconazole (Itracon and Itra) in comparison with the innovative product (Sporal) for the treatment of tinea pedis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The study was a double-blind randomized controlled trial. One hundred and thirty-three patients with tinea pedis were treated with Itracon, Itra or Sporal 200 mg twice daily for 1 week. Clinical and mycological examinations were performed at baseline and at the follow-up visits (taking place at 1, 2, 4 and 12 weeks after the medication administration). RESULTS: Fifty-four, sixty-one and eighteen patients were randomized to Sporal, Itracon and Itra treatment group respectively. Mycological cure rate and clinical response rates were not significantly different among the three groups. Moreover there were also no statistically significant differences with regard to relapse rate. During treatment, no serious adverse events were recorded in any groups. CONCLUSION: The present study demonstrated that the efficacy of the original and generic itraconazole is not significantly different in the treatment of tinea pedis by the pulse regimen.
|
Authors | Saowanee Hoharitanon, Janejira Chaichalotornkul, Wannasri Sindhupak |
Journal | Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand = Chotmaihet thangphaet
(J Med Assoc Thai)
Vol. 88 Suppl 4
Pg. S167-72
(Sep 2005)
ISSN: 0125-2208 [Print] Thailand |
PMID | 16623023
(Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Antifungal Agents
- Drugs, Generic
- Itraconazole
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Antifungal Agents
(therapeutic use)
- Drugs, Generic
- Female
- Humans
- Itraconazole
(therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Tinea Pedis
(drug therapy)
- Treatment Outcome
|