Abstract | AIMS: METHODS: With a computerised version of the NAT, horizontal and vertical aniseikonia was measured in 16 individuals (mean 47 (SD 16.46) years) with no ocular history and 14 patients (mean 67.7 (14.36) years) with ERM. Test validity was evaluated by inducing aniseikonia with size lenses. Test reliability was assessed by the test-retest method. RESULTS: In normal individuals, the mean percentage (SD) aniseikonia was -0.24% (0.71) horizontal and 0% (0.59) vertical. Validity studies revealed mean (SD) 0.990 (0.005) horizontal and 0.991 (0.004) vertical correlation coefficients, 0.985 (0.111) horizontal and 0.989 (0.102) vertical slope. Repeatability coefficients were 1.04 horizontal and 0.88 vertical. Aniseikonia in patients with ERM ranged from 4% to 14%. Eight patients showed 2% or more size difference between horizontal and vertical meridians. CONCLUSIONS: The aniseikonia test used in this study can be considered a simple, fast, valid and reliable method to measure the difference in image size perceived by each eye. Aniseikonia does occur in symptomatic patients with ERM. The effect of ERM on image size is heterogeneous across the retinal area affected.
|
Authors | M Ugarte, T H Williamson |
Journal | The British journal of ophthalmology
(Br J Ophthalmol)
Vol. 89
Issue 12
Pg. 1576-80
(Dec 2005)
ISSN: 0007-1161 [Print] England |
PMID | 16299133
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Validation Study)
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Aniseikonia
(diagnosis, etiology, physiopathology)
- Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
- Epiretinal Membrane
(complications, physiopathology)
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Refraction, Ocular
- Reproducibility of Results
- Vision Tests
(methods)
- Visual Acuity
|