Inconsistencies in cardiac arrest reporting.

Abstract

Data relating to survival from in-hospital cardiac arrest are used to audit staff performance and to help to determine whether new resuscitation techniques are effective. Individual studies into outcome from cardiac arrest have defined inclusion and exclusion criteria, but no such national criteria have been published to enable constant auditing of cardiac arrests. The aim of this survey was to investigate the consistency with which in-hospital cardiac arrests are recorded throughout the United Kingdom. Such data are, almost universally, collected by Resuscitation Officers (RO). A questionnaire was sent to ROs across the UK asking them to state how they would interpret and categorise hypothetical, but nonetheless typical, clinical situations involving a cardiac arrest team being called. These included an event where the patient had regained consciousness prior to the arrival of the cardiac team and also an event where rigor mortis was already present and the resuscitation promptly abandoned upon the arrival of the cardiac arrest team. The percentage survival to discharge of adult cardiac arrests for each hospital was also requested. This identified whether inclusion or exclusion of certain clinical events may have influenced cardiac arrest survival figures for that hospital. It is clear from this study that in-hospital clinical events when a cardiac arrest team is called are audited with a great deal of inconsistency. Some events, such as a patient who has rigor mortis, are excluded as a false or inappropriate call in some hospitals and included as an unsuccessful resuscitation in others. There is a need for guidance on the inclusion and exclusion criteria for auditing of cardiac arrests so that meaningful data can be obtained from across the UK and useful conclusions drawn. The situation at present will result in data being audited that are of limited use. In the era of evidence-based medicine, it seems vital to obtain accurate cardiac arrest survival figures in order to have any hope of improving them.

• Authors: B P King, A d'Agapeyeff, D A Gabbott
• Journal: Resuscitation (Resuscitation) Vol. 68 Issue 1 Pg. 85-91 (Jan 2006) ISSN: 0300-9572 [Print] Ireland
• PMID: 16221522 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Topics

• Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
• Data Collection (standards)
• Heart Arrest (mortality, therapy)
• Hospitals
• Humans
• Medical Audit
• Medical Records (standards)
• Survival Rate