HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Radioprotection and environmental pollution by the use of the radionuclides 89Sr, 186Re, and 153Sm for pain palliation in metastatic bone diseases. Related calculations].

Abstract
Due to the fact that the existing commercial analgesic drugs are not able to reduce effectively the pain caused by the metastatic bone disease, the use of radiopharmaceuticals with avidity to selectively localize in the metastatic skeletal sites, such as strondium-89 chloride (89Sr-Cl2), rhenium-186-hydroxy ethylene diphosphonate (186Re-HEDP), and samarium-153-ethylene diamine tetramethylene (153Sm-EDTMP), is widely accepted. However this medical application may be dangerous for the occupied personnel and more for general public, if radioactive waste is not properly disposed. In the following article we try to estimate the degree and the significance of that risk. For that reason we discuss the physical properties of these radionuclides and their distribution in the body of the patient. We conclude that 89Sr is not harmful for the physician, the attending personnel or those who live with the patient, because it radiates beta-radiation, while its gamma-radiation is negligeable. The radionuclides 186Re and 153Sm besides beta-radiation, also emit a perceptible amount of gamma-radiation. It has been shown that the exposure to gamma-radiation from these radionuclides of the physician, the attending personnel or those who live with the patient is very low as compared to the internationally accepted radioprotection limits. However the environmental contamination per treatment by either of these three radionuclides is not negligeable in comparison to the national and international accepted limits. Patients that are not in good clinical condition may pose an additional contamination danger to those attending them. For limiting radiocontamination, the annual number of treatments by the above three previous radionuclides, should be considered according to the ALARA principle in relation with the correct handling of these patients, and also considering the fundamentals of radioprotection.
AuthorsEvangelos Sbonias
JournalHellenic journal of nuclear medicine (Hell J Nucl Med) 2005 May-Aug Vol. 8 Issue 2 Pg. 68-73 ISSN: 1790-5427 [Print] Greece
PMID16142246 (Publication Type: English Abstract, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Radioisotopes
Topics
  • Algorithms
  • Body Burden
  • Bone Neoplasms (radiotherapy, secondary)
  • Computer Simulation
  • Environmental Exposure (analysis, prevention & control)
  • Humans
  • Models, Biological
  • Occupational Exposure (analysis, prevention & control)
  • Pain (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Palliative Care (methods)
  • Radiation Injuries (etiology, prevention & control)
  • Radioisotopes (adverse effects, analysis)
  • Radiometry (methods)
  • Relative Biological Effectiveness
  • Risk Assessment (methods)
  • Risk Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: