Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: Thirty-three patients with treatment-resistant auditory hallucinations entered a randomized sham-controlled, double-blind trial. rTMS was applied for 10 consecutive weekdays, for 15 minutes at 1 Hz and 90% of the resting motor threshold. We assessed clinical symptoms and cognitive function. RESULTS: rTMS was safe with no adverse effects on memory and cognitive parameters assessed. Active treatment did not result in a greater therapeutic effect than sham on any measure except for the loudness of hallucinations where there was a significant reduction in the active versus the sham group over time. CONCLUSIONS: The study does not support the effectiveness of rTMS using the stimulation parameters provided. However, it does suggest that rTMS methods may have a therapeutic role and indicates the need for further exploration of alternative and more effective stimulation methods.
|
Authors | Paul B Fitzgerald, Jessica Benitez, Jeff Z Daskalakis, Timothy L Brown, Natasha A U Marston, Anthony de Castella, Jayashri Kulkarni |
Journal | Journal of clinical psychopharmacology
(J Clin Psychopharmacol)
Vol. 25
Issue 4
Pg. 358-62
(Aug 2005)
ISSN: 0271-0749 [Print] United States |
PMID | 16012279
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Cerebral Cortex
- Cognition
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Hallucinations
(psychology, therapy)
- Humans
- Magnetics
(therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Neuropsychological Tests
- Physical Therapy Modalities
- Treatment Failure
|