HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A comparison of propofol, midazolam, and methohexital for sedation during retrobulbar and peribulbar block.

AbstractSTUDY OBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacy of propofol, methohexital, and midazalom in providing adequate sedation during administration of retrobulbar block and satisfactory postoperative amnesia.
DESIGN:
Retrospective chart review over a 4-month period.
SETTING:
Ambulatory patients in the main operating room of a university-affiliated hospital.
PATIENTS:
One hundred forty-seven ambulatory patients undergoing ophthalmologic surgery of less than 2 hours' duration under regional anesthesia consisting of retrobulbar or peribulbar block and intravenous (IV) sedation.
INTERVENTIONS:
One of three drugs--propofol 0.47 +/- 0.06 mg/kg, midazolam 0.02 +/- 0.005 mg/kg, or methohexital 0.45 +/- 0.16 mg/kg--was administered IV. Patients were observed for a minimum of 60 seconds or until adequate sedation was achieved, after which a retrobulbar or peribulbar block was performed.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS:
Blood pressure, electrocardiogram, and oxygen saturation were monitored and recorded. Patients were observed for apnea, hiccups, pain on injection, excitement, tremor, grimacing, or verbal response during the block. The requirement for additional sedation intraoperatively was noted. Patients were questioned postoperatively in the ambulatory recovery room for recall of needle insertion or discomfort during the block, as well as about their satisfaction with the overall experience.
CONCLUSIONS:
Grimacing or verbal response during the retrobulbar or peribulbar block did not predict or correlate with patient recall. Propofol was equal to both midazolam and methohexital in providing adequate sedation and postoperative amnesia but possesses the added advantages of reduced postoperative vomiting, lower intraocular pressure, and earlier return-to-home readiness.
AuthorsL R Ferrari, J V Donlon
JournalJournal of clinical anesthesia (J Clin Anesth) 1992 Mar-Apr Vol. 4 Issue 2 Pg. 93-6 ISSN: 0952-8180 [Print] United States
PMID1562343 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives
  • Methohexital
  • Midazolam
  • Propofol
Topics
  • Ambulatory Surgical Procedures
  • Costs and Cost Analysis
  • Humans
  • Hypnotics and Sedatives (administration & dosage, economics)
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Methohexital (administration & dosage, economics)
  • Midazolam (administration & dosage, economics)
  • Nerve Block
  • Ophthalmologic Surgical Procedures
  • Propofol (administration & dosage, economics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: