Abstract |
A retrospective analysis of 61 patients forms the basis for this paper's comment on three major types of pyogenic spinal disease. The first group consists of 22 patients with vertebral osteomyelitis and intervertebral discitis. The second group comprises 22 patients in whom the diagnosis of pyogenic spinal disease was made only after failure of discectomy. In retrospect they were shown to have atypical degenerative disc disease and were similar to the first group. The third group of 17 patients, while demonstrating some similarities to the second group, represents true postdiscectomy wound infection. An understanding of the clinical presentation and pathophysiology of pyogenic disease of the spine allows it to be distinguished preoperatively from degenerative disc disease which superficially it resembles. Further, true postdiscectomy wound infection can be distinguished from pyogenic spinal disease misdiagnosed preoperatively. The differences in the results of treatment of these three groups warrant such distinctions.
|
Authors | P A Gutmanis, C H Rorabeck |
Journal | Canadian journal of surgery. Journal canadien de chirurgie
(Can J Surg)
Vol. 22
Issue 2
Pg. 162-6
(Mar 1979)
ISSN: 0008-428X [Print] Canada |
PMID | 156062
(Publication Type: Journal Article)
|
Topics |
- Back Pain
(diagnosis)
- Bacterial Infections
(diagnosis, surgery)
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Female
- Humans
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement
(diagnosis, surgery)
- Male
- Osteomyelitis
(diagnosis)
- Spinal Diseases
(diagnosis, surgery)
- Surgical Wound Infection
(diagnosis)
|