Abstract | BACKGROUND: METHODS: After ethics committee approval and consent, 40 adult patients undergoing surgery and general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of four groups: midazolam 2 mg, midazolam 5 mg, midazolam 10 mg or control ( normal saline). Measurements were made from 12 min prior to induction of anaesthesia, and the study drug was administered 8 min prior to induction of anaesthesia. Midazolam effects were measured using visual recognition of posters, recall of specific events, bispectral index (BIS) and sedation visual analogue score. RESULTS: Recognition and recall rates were similar between groups up until the time of study drug administration, with no evidence of retrograde amnesia (all P>0.3). There was a dose-dependent deterioration in visual recall (P=0.002), event recollection (P<0.001), BIS (P<0.001) and sedation score (P<0.001) following i.v. midazolam when compared with control. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | R Bulach, P S Myles, M Russnak |
Journal | British journal of anaesthesia
(Br J Anaesth)
Vol. 94
Issue 3
Pg. 300-5
(Mar 2005)
ISSN: 0007-0912 [Print] England |
PMID | 15567810
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
- Midazolam
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Amnesia, Retrograde
(chemically induced)
- Anesthesia, General
- Conscious Sedation
(methods)
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Double-Blind Method
- Electroencephalography
(drug effects)
- Humans
- Hypnotics and Sedatives
(pharmacology)
- Mental Recall
(drug effects)
- Midazolam
(pharmacology)
- Middle Aged
- Preanesthetic Medication
- Recognition, Psychology
(drug effects)
|