Abstract | OBJECTIVE: METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind trial was performed comparing the use of cefazolin for duration of tube thoracostomy placement (Group A) versus 24 hours (Group B) versus placebo (Group C). RESULTS: A total of 224 patients received 229 tube thoracostomies. Logistic regression analysis revealed that duration of tube placement and thoracic acute injury score were predictive of empyema (p <0.05). Empyema tended to occur more frequently in patients with penetrating injuries (p=0.09). chi analysis showed pneumonia occurred significantly more frequently in blunt than penetrating injuries (p <0.05). Presumptive antibiotic use did not significantly effect the incidence of empyema or pneumonia, although no empyemas occurred in Group A. CONCLUSIONS:
|
Authors | Robert A Maxwell, Donald J Campbell, Timothy C Fabian, Martin A Croce, Fred A Luchette, Andrew J Kerwin, Kimberly A Davis, Kimberly Nagy, Samuel Tisherman |
Journal | The Journal of trauma
(J Trauma)
Vol. 57
Issue 4
Pg. 742-8; discussion 748-9
(Oct 2004)
ISSN: 0022-5282 [Print] United States |
PMID | 15514527
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Antibiotic Prophylaxis
- Cefazolin
(therapeutic use)
- Chest Tubes
- Device Removal
- Double-Blind Method
- Empyema, Pleural
(prevention & control)
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Hemopneumothorax
(etiology, physiopathology, surgery)
- Humans
- Injury Severity Score
- Logistic Models
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Multivariate Analysis
- Pneumonia, Bacterial
(prevention & control)
- Prospective Studies
- Reference Values
- Risk Assessment
- Thoracic Injuries
(complications, surgery)
- Thoracostomy
(adverse effects, methods)
- Trauma Centers
- Treatment Outcome
|