Abstract | AIMS: METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients were randomized to receive either a sham (n = 200) or an active impedance threshold device (n = 200) during advanced cardiac life support performed with active compression- decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation. The primary endpoint of this study was 24 h survival. The 24 h survival rates were 44/200 (22%) with the sham valve and 64/200 (32%) with the active valve (P = 0.02). The number of patients who had a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospital discharge rates was 77 (39%), 57 (29%), and 8 (4%) in the sham valve group versus 96 (48%) (P = 0.05), 79 (40%) (P = 0.02), and 10 (5%) (P = 0.6) in the active valve group. Six out of ten survivors in the active valve group and 1/8 survivors in the sham group had normal neurological function at hospital discharge (P = 0.1). CONCLUSION:
|
Authors | Patrick Plaisance, Keith G Lurie, Eric Vicaut, Dominique Martin, Pierre-Yves Gueugniaud, Jean-Luc Petit, Didier Payen |
Journal | Resuscitation
(Resuscitation)
Vol. 61
Issue 3
Pg. 265-71
(Jun 2004)
ISSN: 0300-9572 [Print] Ireland |
PMID | 15172704
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Topics |
- Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation
(adverse effects, methods)
- Double-Blind Method
- Electric Countershock
- Emergency Medical Services
- Female
- Heart Arrest
(mortality, therapy)
- Heart Massage
(adverse effects)
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Respiration, Artificial
(adverse effects, instrumentation, methods)
- Survival Rate
|