HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Relationships between pacing mode and quality of life: evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Abstract
Although mode-dependent differences in mortality are for the moment unproven, establishing a health-related quality of life difference between assigned pacing modes would be useful. Such a difference, if one exists, should be >or=0.5 standard deviation units among scales using validated instruments to have significant clinical meaning. Two large data sets, the Canadian Trial of Physiological Pacing (CTOPP) and the Mode Selection Trial (MOST) both similar in design, largely failed to clearly establish such a significant difference. Another trial the Pacemaker Selection in the Elderly (PASE) did suggest that for sinus node disease, DDD-R pacing may lead to an improvement in quality of life mainly early post implant. Two other large trials, UK-PACE and DANPACE have yet to present quality of life related results. All published data have established that restoration of chronotropic competence by pacing leads to improvements in quality of life that are significant. In CTOPP an attempt to quantify a mode-dependent difference for a pacemaker syndrome suggested that the prevalence and clinical importance of pacemaker syndrome may be exaggerated. The relative ease of crossover from VVI-R to DDD, by device upgrade in CTOPP or by programming in MOST, may explain the 2.9% vs. 31% crossover rates seen in CTOPP vs. MOST respectively. Trials to date may have had a mode dependent difference undermined by possible adverse effects from right ventricular apical sites of pacing. Future trial data; DANPACE, sinus node disease AAI-R vs. DDD-R and PAVE, post AVJ ablation VVI-R vs. VVI-CRT, will asses in more detail the role of site of pacing as a factor in determining mode dependent outcomes in pacing.
AuthorsDavid Newman
JournalCardiac electrophysiology review (Card Electrophysiol Rev) Vol. 7 Issue 4 Pg. 401-5 (Dec 2003) ISSN: 1385-2264 [Print] United States
PMID15071264 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Topics
  • Cardiac Pacing, Artificial
  • Health Status Indicators
  • Humans
  • Pacemaker, Artificial
  • Quality of Life
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: