HOMEPRODUCTSSERVICESCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaMobileSign Up FREE or Login

Late incidence and determinants of reoperation in patients with prosthetic heart valves.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
Reoperation is a relatively common event in patients with prosthetic heart valves, but its actual occurrence can vary widely from one patient to another. With a focus on bioprosthetic valves, this study examines risk factors for reoperation in a large patient cohort.
METHODS:
Patients (N=3233) who underwent a total of 3633 operations for aortic (AVR) or mitral valve replacement (MVR) between 1970 and 2002 were prospectively followed (total 21,179 patient-years; mean 6.6+/-5.0 years; maximum 32.4 years). The incidence of prosthetic valve reoperation and the impact of patient- and valve-related variables were determined with actual and actuarial methods.
RESULTS:
Fifteen-year actual freedom from all-cause reoperation was 94.1% for aortic mechanical valves, 61.4% for aortic bioprosthetic valves, 94.8% for mitral mechanical valves, and 63.3% for mitral bioprosthetic valves. In both aortic and mitral positions, current bioprosthesis models had significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses (15-year reoperation odds-ratio 0.11+/-0.04; P<0.01 for aortic, and 0.42+/-0.14; P=0.009 for mitral). Current bioprostheses were significantly more durable in the aortic position than in the mitral position (14.3+/-6.8% more freedom from 15-year reoperation; (P=0.018)). Older age was protective, but smoking was an independent risk factor for reoperation after bioprosthetic AVR and MVR (hazard ratio for smoking 2.58 and 1.78, respectively). In patients with aortic bioprostheses, persistent left ventricular hypertrophy at follow-up and smaller prosthesis size predicted an increased incidence of reoperation, while this was not observed in patients with mitral bioprostheses.
CONCLUSIONS:
These analyses indicate that current bioprostheses have significantly better durability than discontinued bioprostheses, reveal a detrimental impact for smoking after AVR and MVR, and indicate an increased reoperation risk in patients with a small aortic bioprosthesis or with persistent left ventricular hypertrophy after AVR.
AuthorsMarc Ruel, Alexander Kulik, Fraser D Rubens, Pierre Bédard, Roy G Masters, Andrew L Pipe, Thierry G Mesana
JournalEuropean journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery (Eur J Cardiothorac Surg) Vol. 25 Issue 3 Pg. 364-70 (Mar 2004) ISSN: 1010-7940 [Print] England
PMID15019662 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Age Factors
  • Aged
  • Aortic Valve (surgery)
  • Bioprosthesis
  • Body Surface Area
  • Cohort Studies
  • Coronary Artery Disease (complications)
  • Female
  • Heart Valve Diseases (surgery)
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis
  • Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation
  • Humans
  • Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular (complications)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Mitral Valve (surgery)
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Reoperation
  • Risk Factors
  • Sex Factors
  • Smoking (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research network!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password: