The purpose of this randomized clinical trial was to evaluate the clinical performance of brackets cured with 2 different light-curing units (conventional
halogen light and plasma
arc light); 83 patients treated with
fixed appliances were included in the study. With the "split-mouth" design, each patient's mouth was divided into 4 quadrants. In 42 randomly selected patients, the maxillary left and mandibular right quadrants were cured with the
halogen light, and the remaining quadrants were cured with the plasma
arc light. In the other 41 patients, the quadrants were inverted. A total of 1434
stainless steel brackets were examined: 717 were cured with a conventional
halogen light for 20 seconds; the remaining 717 were cured with the plasma
arc light for 5 seconds. The number, cause, and date of bracket failures were recorded for each light-curing unit over 12 months. Statistical analysis was performed with the Fisher exact test, the Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, and the log-rank test. No statistically significant differences were found between the total bond failure rates of the brackets cured with the
halogen light and those cured with the plasma
arc light. Neither were significant differences found when the clinical performances of the maxillary versus mandibular arches or the anterior versus posterior segments were compared. These findings demonstrate that plasma
arc lights are an advantageous alternative to conventional light curing, because they significantly reduce the curing time of
orthodontic brackets without affecting the bond failure rate.