HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomised controlled trial and economic evaluation of podophyllotoxin solution, podophyllotoxin cream, and podophyllin in the treatment of genital warts.

AbstractOBJECTIVES:
To evaluate the efficacy and cost effectiveness of self applied podophyllotoxin 0.5% solution and podophyllotoxin 0.15% cream, compared to clinic applied 25% podophyllin in the treatment of genital warts over 4 weeks.
METHODS:
We conducted a randomised controlled trial in 358 immunocompetent men and women with genital warts of 3 months' duration or less.
RESULTS:
In the principal analysis both podophyllotoxin solution (OR 2.93, 95% CI 1.56 to 5.50) and podophyllotoxin cream (OR 1.97, 95% CI 1.04 to 3.70) were associated with significantly increased odds of remission of all warts compared to podophyllin. We performed two further analyses. When subjects defaulting from follow up were assumed to have been cured odds of remission of all warts were also significantly increased both for podophyllotoxin solution (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.68 to 5.49) and for podophyllotoxin cream (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.38 to 4.40). When subjects defaulting from follow up were assumed not to have been cured odds of remission of all warts were significantly increased for podophyllotoxin solution (OR 1.92, 95% CI 1.13 to 3.27), but not for podophyllotoxin cream (OR 1.17, 95% CI 0.69 to 2.00). Local side effects were seen in 24% of subjects, and recurrence of warts within 12 weeks of study entry in 43% of all initially cleared subjects, without statistically significant differences between the treatment groups. Direct, indirect, and total costs were similar across the three treatment groups. Podophyllotoxin solution was the most cost effective treatment, followed by podophyllotoxin cream, with podophyllin treatment being the least cost effective.
CONCLUSIONS:
Self treatment of anogenital warts with podophyllotoxin showed greater efficacy and cost effectiveness than clinic based treatment with podophyllin.
AuthorsC J N Lacey, R L Goodall, G Ragnarson Tennvall, R Maw, G R Kinghorn, P G Fisk, S Barton, I Byren, Perstop Pharma Genital Warts Clinical Trial Group
JournalSexually transmitted infections (Sex Transm Infect) Vol. 79 Issue 4 Pg. 270-5 (Aug 2003) ISSN: 1368-4973 [Print] England
PMID12902571 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Keratolytic Agents
  • Ointments
  • Podophyllotoxin
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Anus Neoplasms (drug therapy, economics)
  • Condylomata Acuminata (drug therapy, economics)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Costs
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host
  • Keratolytic Agents (administration & dosage, economics)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ointments
  • Podophyllotoxin (administration & dosage, economics)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: