HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A multicenter controlled clinical trial of open versus endovascular treatment of abdominal aortic aneurysm.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a novel endovascular graft for elective treatment of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The device is a modular bifurcated system with nitinol/expanded polytetrafluoroethylene components and a smaller profile than currently approved devices.
METHODS:
In a multicenter, concurrent controlled phase II trial, 334 patients underwent treatment with the Excluder bifurcated endoprosthesis (test, n = 235; W. L. Gore & Associates, Inc, Sunnyvale, Calif) or with standard open repair (control, n = 99). Preoperative characteristics, perioperative variables, follow-up clinical evaluations, and radiographic examination results through the first 2 years were analyzed with univariable and multivariable statistics.
RESULTS:
Patients in the test group had less blood loss (310 +/- 19 mL versus 1590 +/- 124 mL; P <.0001), fewer homologous transfusions (6% versus 32%; P <.0001), and shorter lengths of stay (2.0 +/- 0.1 days versus 9.8 +/- 1.4 days; P <.0001). Early major adverse events were markedly reduced in the test group (14% versus 57%; P <.0001), and this difference persisted at 2 years. No difference was seen in survival rate (P =.13). In the first 2 years, no deployment failure, early conversion, or aneurysm rupture occurred. At the 2-year timepoint, core laboratory read trunk migration in 1%, limb migration in 1%, limb narrowing in 1%, endoleak in 20%, and aneurysm growth in 14%. One wire discontinuity (0.6%) was identified in a discharge film. A 7% annual reintervention rate was seen in the test group in the first 2 years.
SUMMARY:
The test device is a safe and effective treatment compared with open surgical repair for infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm. The most striking benefits are reduced blood loss, fewer complications, and faster recovery. Two-year survival rate was similar.
AuthorsJon S Matsumura, David C Brewster, Michel S Makaroun, David C Naftel
JournalJournal of vascular surgery (J Vasc Surg) Vol. 37 Issue 2 Pg. 262-71 (Feb 2003) ISSN: 0741-5214 [Print] United States
PMID12563194 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase II, Controlled Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Aged
  • Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal (diagnostic imaging, mortality, surgery)
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis (adverse effects)
  • Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation (adverse effects)
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Postoperative Complications
  • Radiography
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Survival Rate
  • Time Factors
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures (adverse effects)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: