HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Splenectomy versus conservative management for acute sequestration crises in people with sickle cell disease.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Acute splenic sequestration crises are a complication of sickle cell disease, with high mortality rates and frequent recurrence in survivors of first attacks. Splenectomy and blood transfusion, with their consequences, are the mainstay of long term management used in different parts of the world.
OBJECTIVES:
To assess whether splenectomy (total or partial) to prevent acute splenic sequestration crises in people with sickle cell disease improved survival and decreased morbidity in patients with sickle cell disease, as compared with regular blood transfusion.
SEARCH STRATEGY:
We searched the Cochrane Cystic Fibrosis and Genetic Disorders Group specialist trials register which comprises references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches, hand searching relevant journals and hand searching abstract books of conference proceedings Additional randomized controlled trials were sought from the reference lists of the studies found and reviews identified by the search strategy. Date of the most recent search: December 2001
SELECTION CRITERIA:
All randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing splenectomy (total or partial) to prevent recurrence of acute splenic sequestration crises to no treatment or blood transfusion in people with sickle cell disease.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS:
No trials of splenectomy for acute splenic sequestration were found.
MAIN RESULTS:
No trials of splenectomy for acute splenic sequestration were found.
REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS:
Splenectomy, if full, will prevent further sequestration and if partial, may reduce the recurrence of acute splenic sequestration crises but there is lack of evidence from trials that it improves survival and decreases morbidity in sickle cell disease. There is a need for a well-designed, adequately powered randomised controlled trial to assess the benefits and risks of splenectomy compared to transfusion programmes as a means of improving survival and decreasing mortality from ASS in people with sickle cell disease.
AuthorsS Owusu-Ofori, C Riddington
JournalThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Cochrane Database Syst Rev) Issue 4 Pg. CD003425 ( 2002) ISSN: 1469-493X [Electronic] England
PMID12519596 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review, Systematic Review)
Topics
  • Acute Disease
  • Anemia, Sickle Cell (complications)
  • Blood Transfusion
  • Humans
  • Splenectomy
  • Splenic Diseases (surgery, therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: