Abstract |
As demonstrated in several validation studies, the dermal phototoxic potential of chemicals in humans can be effectively assessed by in vitro methods. The core of these methods is to monitor dose-response curves of a chemical in the absence and presence of light, to quantify the difference between these two curves by appropriate measures (either the photo-irritancy factor [PIF], or the mean photo effect [MPE]), and to use these measures as predictors of in vivo phototoxicity. We present new concentration-response analysis software for in vitro phototoxicity testing, which runs on current personal computers, and takes into account all the limitations identified when using a former program. We also demonstrate the validity and robustness of this new software by applying it retrospectively to all data available from two phases of the EU/COLIPA validation trial for the 3T3 neutral red update in vitro phototoxicity test. Some frequently raised questions pertaining to the use of prediction models in phototoxicity testing are addressed, including: the necessity of using prediction models based on a cut-off; whether it is justifiable to use sharp prediction cut-off values; whether there is a biostatistical justification for the highest concentration of the test chemical; and whether repeated testing of a chemical is required.
|
Authors | Björn Peters, Hermann-Georg Holzhütter |
Journal | Alternatives to laboratory animals : ATLA
(Altern Lab Anim)
2002 Jul-Aug
Vol. 30
Issue 4
Pg. 415-32
ISSN: 0261-1929 [Print] England |
PMID | 12234247
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Validation Study)
|
Chemical References |
- Irritants
- Xenobiotics
- Neutral Red
|
Topics |
- 3T3 Cells
(drug effects, metabolism)
- Animal Testing Alternatives
(methods)
- Animals
- Dermatitis, Phototoxic
- Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
- Humans
- Irritants
(classification, toxicity)
- Mice
- Models, Theoretical
- Neutral Red
(metabolism)
- Predictive Value of Tests
- Software
- Software Design
- Xenobiotics
(classification, toxicity)
|