HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of desonide phosphate for the treatment of allergic conjunctivitis.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To study the safety and efficacy of the topical corticosteroid, desonide 0.25% ophthalmic solution, for inhibition of the clinical allergic reaction induced by conjunctival provocation (CPT) and for the treatment of seasonal allergic conjunctivitis (SAC).
METHODS:
For the CPT study, 12 allergic but inactive patients were exposed in both eyes to increasing doses of a specific allergen until a positive bilateral, symmetrical early- and late-phase reaction was obtained. After 2 weeks the last positive dose was readministrated and their positive response confirmed. After an additional 2 weeks, CPT was performed 30 minutes after topical administration of desonide in one eye and placebo in the contralateral eye (Group A) or after topical desonide or placebo four times a day for 2 days (Group B). Clinical signs and symptoms were recorded after 15, 30, and 60 minutes, and after 6 hours. Regarding the seasonal study, 96 patients with active SAC were treated bilaterally with either desonide or fluorometholone for 3 weeks, and allergic signs and symptoms evaluated at regular intervals. The safety of the drugs was assessed by identification of any side effects or adverse events of any kind.
RESULTS:
For the CPT study: individual itching and redness, and the sum score for signs and symptoms were all statistically (p < 0.05) and clinically (greater than 1 change between treated eyes) significantly lower in desonide versus placebo eyes. Both early- and late-phase reactions were reduced by desonide pretreatment. Seasonal study: desonide and fluorometholone were both highly effective in reducing itching, tearing, and conjunctival hyperemia over time (p < 0.0001). Both drugs appeared safe, with no statistically significant changes in IOP observed with either treatment.
CONCLUSIONS:
Desonide has a significant therapeutic effect on both the induced conjunctival early- and late-allergic reaction and in active SAC. It was also safe, with no side effects such as increases in intraocular pressure observed by physician or patient.
AuthorsAndrea Leonardi, Vincenzo Papa, Giovanni Milazzo, Antonio G Secchi
JournalCornea (Cornea) Vol. 21 Issue 5 Pg. 476-81 (Jul 2002) ISSN: 0277-3740 [Print] United States
PMID12072722 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Evaluation Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Allergens
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents
  • Glucocorticoids
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Desonide
  • Fluorometholone
Topics
  • Administration, Topical
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Allergens (adverse effects)
  • Anti-Inflammatory Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Conjunctivitis, Allergic (diagnosis, drug therapy, etiology)
  • Desonide (therapeutic use)
  • Diagnostic Techniques, Ophthalmological
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Evaluation
  • Female
  • Fluorometholone (therapeutic use)
  • Glucocorticoids
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Radioallergosorbent Test
  • Safety

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: