HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Plasma D-dimers in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism.

Abstract
Clinical suspicion for venous thromboembolism (VTE) mandates objective testing to confirm or exclude the diagnosis. However, current imaging modalities are imperfect because of a small but important risk of complications with invasive techniques or limited sensitivity with noninvasive ones. A diagnostic tool for VTE is needed that is noninvasive and highly accurate, allowing immediate treatment decisions to be made in most cases. Plasma D-dimers (D-ds), specific cross-linked fibrin derivatives, partially fulfill these criteria in that they are sensitive markers for thrombosis but lack specificity. They therefore cannot be used to make a positive diagnosis of VTE; however, they generally have high negative predictive value and are useful as an exclusionary test, a potentially important role given that VTE is eventually ruled out in most patients investigated. Clinical management studies are clarifying the role of D-ds in the diagnostic paradigm of VTE: negative ultrasound and D-d findings obviate the need for serial imaging in suspected deep vein thrombosis, and anticoagulant therapy can be safely withheld in patients with non-high clinical suspicion for pulmonary embolism and non-high probability ventilation perfusion scan if D-d test results are negative. More recently, the combination of a negative SimpliRED (AGEN Biomedical Ltd, Brisbane, Australia) D-d result and low clinical suspicion derived using a formal scoring system has been shown to exclude deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism and to obviate the need for imaging. Several different D-d assays are now available, and clinicians should be aware of the performance characteristics of the test used before incorporation into diagnostic algorithms as these will differ between assays, and the results of clinical management studies cannot necessarily be safely extrapolated to assays other than those specifically evaluated. If alternative assays are to be substituted, these should consistently have been shown to possess equivalent or greater sensitivity.
AuthorsJames Kelly, Anthony Rudd, Roger R Lewis, Beverley J Hunt
JournalArchives of internal medicine (Arch Intern Med) Vol. 162 Issue 7 Pg. 747-56 (Apr 08 2002) ISSN: 0003-9926 [Print] United States
PMID11926847 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
Chemical References
  • Biomarkers
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products
  • fibrin fragment D
Topics
  • Biomarkers (analysis)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay (methods)
  • Fibrin Fibrinogen Degradation Products (analysis)
  • Humans
  • Phlebography (methods)
  • Pulmonary Embolism (blood, diagnosis)
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Venous Thrombosis (blood, diagnosis)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: