Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients.

Abstract

The management of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and pulmonary embolism (PE) in patients with cancer can be a clinical dilemma. Comorbid conditions, warfarin failure, difficult venous access, and a high bleeding risk are some of the factors that often complicate anticoagulant therapy in these patients. In addition, the use of central venous access devices is increasing but the optimal treatment of catheter-related thrombosis remains controversial. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the traditional standard for the initial treatment of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) have been shown to be equally safe and effective in hemodynamically stable patients. For long-term treatment or secondary prophylaxis, vitamin K antagonists remain the mainstay treatment. However, the inconvenience and narrow therapeutic window of oral anticoagulants make extended therapy unattractive and problematic. As a result, LMWHs are being evaluated as an alternative for long-term therapy. New antithrombotic agents are being tested in clinical trials and may have the potential to replace conventional treatment. The role of inferior vena cava filters in cancer patients remains ill defined but these devices remain the treatment of choice in patients with contraindications for anticoagulant therapy.

• Authors: A Y Lee
• Journal: Thrombosis research (Thromb Res) Vol. 102 Issue 6 Pg. V195-208 (Jun 15 2001) ISSN: 0049-3848 [Print] United States
• PMID: 11516453 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Review)

Chemical References

• Anticoagulants
• Heparin

Topics

• Anticoagulants (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
• Heparin (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
• Humans
• Neoplasms (complications)
• Recurrence
• Thromboembolism (drug therapy, etiology)
• Venous Thrombosis (drug therapy, etiology)