HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two eye gels in the treatment of dry eyes: Lacrinorm and Viscotears.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To compare the efficacy and safety of two carbomer 940 eye gels in the treatment of dry eyes: Lacrinorm (also called GelTears), a recently introduced eye gel, and Viscotears (also called Vidisic or Lacrigel), used as a reference gel. The main difference between the two gels is in the preservative, respectively benzalkonium chloride and cetrimide.
METHODS:
A double-masked, randomised, parallel-group study was conducted in 16 centres in four European countries. A total of 179 patients suffering from aqueous-deficient dry eye were enrolled, of whom 92 were randomised to treatment with Lacrinorm and 87 to the reference gel. Gel was instilled four times a day for a period of 30 days.
RESULTS:
After 30 days of treatment, subjective symptoms (the combined scores of foreign body sensation, ocular dryness, burning or pain, and photophobia) had improved by 50% in the Lacrinorm group and by 45% in the reference gel group, and objective test results (break-up time, fluorescein test, Schirmer test, Lissamine Green test) by 35-36% in the Lacrinorm group and 25-45% in the reference group. The improvements were significant in both treatment groups (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the treatment groups. Subjective local tolerability upon instillation on day 30 was rated 'good' or 'very good' by 91% of patients in both treatment groups. Adverse events were reported for 21 patients in the Lacrinorm group and 17 in the reference group, the most frequent being discomfort, blurred vision, hyperaemia, burning and itching. The frequency and descriptions of adverse events did not differ significantly between the two treatment groups. No serious adverse events were reported.
CONCLUSIONS:
Over the period of study, Lacrinorm eye gel was as effective and safe as Viscotears/Lacrigel in the treatment of dry eye.
AuthorsA J Bron, P Daubas, R Siou-Mermet, C Trinquand
JournalEye (London, England) (Eye (Lond)) Vol. 12 ( Pt 5) Pg. 839-47 ( 1998) ISSN: 0950-222X [Print] England
PMID10070521 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Acrylic Resins
  • Benzalkonium Compounds
  • Cetrimonium Compounds
  • Gels
  • Ophthalmic Solutions
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
  • carbopol 940
  • Cetrimonium
Topics
  • Acrylic Resins (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Benzalkonium Compounds
  • Cetrimonium
  • Cetrimonium Compounds
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Gels
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Ophthalmic Solutions (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Patient Compliance
  • Preservatives, Pharmaceutical
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Xerophthalmia (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: