HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and safety of leflunomide compared with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis: a double-blind, randomised, multicentre trial. European Leflunomide Study Group.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
Phase II trials of leflunomide, an inhibitor of de-novo pyrimidine synthesis, have shown efficacy in rheumatoid arthritis. This double-blind randomised trial compared leflunomide with placebo and sulphasalazine in active rheumatoid arthritis.
METHODS:
358 patients were randomly assigned leflunomide (100 mg daily on days 1-3, then 20 mg daily), placebo, or sulphasalazine (0.5 g daily, titrated progressively to 2.0 g daily at week 4). The primary endpoints were tender and swollen joint counts and investigator's and patient's overall assessments. Analyses were by intention to treat.
FINDINGS:
The mean changes in the leflunomide, placebo, and sulphasalazine groups were -9.7, -4.3, and -8.1 for tender joint count; -7.2, -3.4, and -6.2 for swollen joint count; -1.1, -0.3, and -1.0 for physician's overall assessment; and -1.1, -0.4, and -1.1 for patient's overall assessment. Leflunomide and sulphasalazine were significantly superior to placebo (p=0.0001 for joint counts; p<0.001 for assessments). Radiographic disease progression was significantly slower with leflunomide and sulphasalazine than with placebo (p<0.01). Most common adverse events with leflunomide were diarrhoea (17%), nausea (10%), alopecia (8%), and rash (10%). Transiently abnormal liver function was seen in three leflunomide-group patients and five sulphasalazine-group patients. There were two cases of reversible agranulocytosis in the sulphasalazine group.
INTERPRETATION:
Leflunomide was more effective than placebo in treatment of rheumatoid arthritis and showed similar efficacy to sulphasalazine. Leflunomide was well tolerated. This drug may be a useful option as a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.
AuthorsJ S Smolen, J R Kalden, D L Scott, B Rozman, T K Kvien, A Larsen, I Loew-Friedrich, C Oed, R Rosenburg
JournalLancet (London, England) (Lancet) Vol. 353 Issue 9149 Pg. 259-66 (Jan 23 1999) ISSN: 0140-6736 [Print] England
PMID9929017 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antirheumatic Agents
  • Immunosuppressive Agents
  • Isoxazoles
  • Placebos
  • Sulfasalazine
  • Leflunomide
Topics
  • Algorithms
  • Analysis of Variance
  • Antirheumatic Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Arthritis, Rheumatoid (diagnostic imaging, drug therapy)
  • Disease Progression
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Immunosuppressive Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Isoxazoles (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Leflunomide
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Placebos
  • Radiography
  • Statistics, Nonparametric
  • Sulfasalazine (therapeutic use)
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: