Legal problems related to obstetrical ultrasound.

Abstract

Malpractice suits related to fetal anomalies are now the most common type of litigation involving ultrasound, surpassing ectopic pregnancy. Missing an anomaly on a sonogram performed for a standard indication, such as dating, is the most frequent type of litigation. Other causes of litigation include invented anomalies and unrecognized anomalies that are visible in retrospect on the ultrasonic images. Rarer causes of malpractice problems relate to failure to communicate the results of a sonogram in a timely fashion, failure to inform the patient of the findings about the sonogram at the time the patient is seen, and failure to perform ultrasound studies for anomalies when there is clinical indication to do so, such as elevated alpha-fetoprotein or polyhydramnios. The level of protection given by the obstetrical guidelines are discussed. Particular areas of concern relate to litigation involving missed fetal heart malformations, spina bifida, absent distal limbs, and twins.

• Authors: R C Sanders
• Journal: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences (Ann N Y Acad Sci) Vol. 847 Pg. 220-7 (Jun 18 1998) ISSN: 0077-8923 [Print] United States
• PMID: 9668715 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Topics

• Congenital Abnormalities (diagnostic imaging)
• Diagnostic Errors
• Female
• Fetal Death (diagnostic imaging)
• Fetus (abnormalities)
• Fraud (legislation & jurisprudence)
• Gestational Age
• Humans
• Malpractice (legislation & jurisprudence)
• Obstetrics (legislation & jurisprudence)
• Pregnancy
• Pregnancy Complications (diagnostic imaging)
• Ultrasonography, Prenatal
• United States