We previously demonstrated that
2-iminothiazolidine-4-carboxylic acid (2-ICA), formed by
cyanide reacting with
cysteine, caused
glutamate antagonist-sensitive
seizures when injected i.c.v. (intracerebroventricular) in mice and produced hippocampal CA1 damage following i.c.v. infusion in rats. In this study, the ability of either 2-ICA,
glutamate,
proline or
NMDA (
N-methyl-D-aspartate) injected i.c.v. to produce hippocampal lesions sensitive to
glutamate antagonists was compared in mice. Hippocampal CA1 damage was observed 5-days following either a seizure (3.2 mumol) or subseizure (1.0 mumol) dose of 2-ICA.
Glutamate (3.2 mumol) or
proline (10 mumol) also produced hippocampal damage;
glutamate damage was primarily to the CA1 subfield, whereas
proline damaged neurons throughout the entire hippocampal formation.
NMDA (3.2 nmol) caused seizure activity in all animals with a 50% lethality. No hippocampal damage was observed in surviving mice. Neither
MK-801 (
dizocilpine maleate) nor
CNQX (6-cyano-7-nitroquinoxaline-2,3-dione) pretreatment prevented hippocampal lesions produced by 2-ICA. In contrast,
MK-801 significantly reduced the frequency of mice displaying
glutamate hippocampal lesions, but failed to block
seizures produced by
glutamate.
MK-801 also protected neurons in the CA2-3 zone and the dentate gyrus, but not in the CA1 region of
proline-injected mice. Finally, pretreatment with the mixed
metabotropic glutamate receptor (mGluR)1/
mGluR2 antagonist-agonist (S)-4-carboxy-3-hydroxyphenylglycine (CHPG) prevented hippocampal damage produced by the
mGluR1 agonist (RS)-3,5-dihydroxyphenylglycine (
DHPG), but did not protect against 2-ICA hippocampal lesions. These results show that 2-ICA hippocampal CA1 damage is not mediated through ionotropic or
metabotropic glutamate receptors. 2-ICA hippocampal damage may represent a neurotoxicity that is distinct from excitotoxic-mediated cell death.