Abstract | PURPOSE: METHODS: A multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group clinical investigation was carried out in 54 hospitals in Europe. Of the patients evaluated, 1225 received iodixanol and 1227 iopromide in conventional and/or digital subtraction angiography. RESULTS: The iodixanol group reported statistically significantly less injection-associated pain (0.9%) than the iopromide group (9.5%) (p << 0.001). Further, 4.1% in the iodixanol group experienced pain and/or severe heat sensation vs 19. 8% in the iopromide group (p << 0.001). In the iodixanol group, 1.8% of the patients experienced contrast-related adverse events vs 2.4% in the iopromide group (p = NS). Overall diagnostic information was optimal for 94.1% in the iodixanol group and 95.3% in the iopromide group (p = NS). CONCLUSIONS:
Iodixanol 270 mg I/ml causes significantly less injection-associated pain during femoral arteriography and is as safe and efficacious as iopromide 300 mg I/ml.
|
Authors | P Justesen, M Downes, B H Grynne, H Lang, W Rasch, E Seim |
Journal | Cardiovascular and interventional radiology
(Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol)
1997 Jul-Aug
Vol. 20
Issue 4
Pg. 251-6
ISSN: 0174-1551 [Print] United States |
PMID | 9211770
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Contrast Media
- Triiodobenzoic Acids
- Iohexol
- iopromide
- iodixanol
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Contrast Media
(adverse effects)
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Femoral Artery
(diagnostic imaging)
- Humans
- Injections, Intra-Arterial
(adverse effects)
- Iohexol
(adverse effects, analogs & derivatives)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Pain
(chemically induced)
- Radiography
- Triiodobenzoic Acids
(adverse effects)
|