Abstract | OBJECTIVES: METHODS: A multicentre, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled trial of linopirdine (30 mg three times per day or placebo). Patients (n = 382, 55% male, 98% Caucasian, age range 51-95 years) with mild or moderate Alzheimer's disease, of whom 375 received at least one treatment dose were analysed. There were no important differences between the groups at baseline. RESULTS: No difference was seen in Clinical Global Impression scores between patients receiving placebo and those receiving linopirdine (n = 189). Small differences in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) scores were seen throughout the study favouring linopirdine; at 6 months the ADAS-Cog scores were 20.2 ( linopirdine) and 22.1 (placebo) p = 0.01. CONCLUSIONS: This trial did not detect clinically meaningful differences in patients receiving linopirdine for 6 months, despite evidence of a small degree of improved cognitive function. Further studies may benefit from more sensitive tests of treatment effects in Alzheimer's disease.
|
Authors | K Rockwood, B L Beattie, M R Eastwood, H Feldman, E Mohr, W Pryse-Phillips, S Gauthier |
Journal | The Canadian journal of neurological sciences. Le journal canadien des sciences neurologiques
(Can J Neurol Sci)
Vol. 24
Issue 2
Pg. 140-5
(May 1997)
ISSN: 0317-1671 [Print] England |
PMID | 9164692
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
|
Chemical References |
- Indoles
- Pyridines
- linopirdine
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Alzheimer Disease
(drug therapy, psychology)
- Cognition
(drug effects)
- Double-Blind Method
- Female
- Humans
- Indoles
(therapeutic use)
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Psychiatric Status Rating Scales
- Pyridines
(therapeutic use)
|