Abstract |
Treatment efficacy is typically evaluated by examining group means and pre-post change scores. Although informative, such analyses may obscure individual or subgroup differences in response (outcome profiles). The present study used two different methods to define treatment outcome profiles--rationally-derived criteria (Frank et al., Archives of General Psychiatry 48, 851-855, 1991) and dynamic clustering--to evaluate four treatments of unipolar depression: behaviour therapy, amitriptyline, psychodynamic psychotherapy and relaxation training (attention placebo). The profiling methods yielded similar results. Regardless of treatment, the majority of patients displayed either a recovery or nonremission outcome profile, with relatively few instances of remission followed by a recurrence of depression. These findings challenge the view that any of the treatments are associated with a strong tendency to relapse, at least over the 3-month follow-up period. To further characterize the major outcome profiles, discriminant analysis was performed. Results indicated that recovery and nonremission profiles differed in that the latter was associated with a longer and more severe index episode and greater neuroticism. A number of variables, including family history of depression and therapists' prediction of outcome, failed to distinguish recovered from unremitted patients.
|
Authors | S Taylor, P McLean |
Journal | Behaviour research and therapy
(Behav Res Ther)
Vol. 31
Issue 3
Pg. 325-30
(Mar 1993)
ISSN: 0005-7967 [Print] England |
PMID | 8476408
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Amitriptyline
(therapeutic use)
- Behavior Therapy
- Depressive Disorder
(psychology, therapy)
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Male
- Psychoanalytic Therapy
- Relaxation Therapy
|