Recall bias in disease status associated with perceived exposure to hazardous substances.

Abstract

Recall bias was assessed in a study of cancers reported by persons living in a community with a hazardous waste treatment facility (A) and a control community (B). The self-reported cancers were verified against medical records and pathology reports. Of the 56 cancer cases reported, 43 were in community A and 13 were in community B. The difference in incorrect reporting of neoplasms between community A and community B was 12% for neoplasms and 23% for malignancies. Before verification, there was a borderline significant association (P = 0.049) between living in community A and all self-reported cancers [odds ratio (OR) 1.88, 95% confidence interval 0.99-3.57]. The verified data showed that ORs decreased with the increasing precision of diagnosis. The effect of misclassification on the OR was an inflation by 15% for neoplasms and by 31% for malignancies. The results demonstrate the importance of verifying reported cases of disease, even a disease as well defined as cancer.

• Authors: W E Kaye, H I Hall, J A Lybarger
• Journal: Annals of epidemiology (Ann Epidemiol) Vol. 4 Issue 5 Pg. 393-7 (Sep 1994) ISSN: 1047-2797 [Print] United States
• PMID: 7981847 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Chemical References

• Hazardous Waste

Topics

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Aged
• Aged, 80 and over
• Bias
• Child
• Child, Preschool
• Cohort Studies
• Demography
• Environmental Exposure
• Female
• Hazardous Waste
• Humans
• Male
• Mental Recall
• Neoplasms (chemically induced, classification, epidemiology)
• Odds Ratio
• Prevalence