HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Diagnosing pedal osteomyelitis: testing choices and their consequences.

AbstractOBJECTIVE:
To compare the efficacies and cost-effectiveness of four strategies for the management of suspected pedal osteomyelitis in the setting of vascular impairment: 1) therapeutic trial of short-term antibiotics for presumed cellulitis without osteomyelitis (short); 2) technetium bone scanning followed by either short-term therapy if negative or either a biopsy or aggressive long-term intravenous therapy if positive (scan); 3) bone biopsy followed by long-term intravenous therapy if positive or short-term therapy if negative (biopsy); and 4) immediate long-term intravenous antibiotics for presumed osteomyelitis (long).
DESIGN:
Decision analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis with sensitivity analyses. The main outcomes states are amputation and the resource expenditures associated with bone scans, biopsies, and therapies.
DATA SOURCES:
The authors obtained estimates of test accuracy from literature review and summarized them using newly developed meta-analytic techniques.
MAIN RESULTS:
The optimal decision depends heavily on the estimated probability of osteomyelitis at presentation. At very low probabilities, the short-term strategy is preferred. When the probability of osteomyelitis is from 2% to 8%, the lowest amputation rate occurs when one does a diagnostic scan. From 8% to 50%, the best outcomes follow biopsy. At probabilities higher than 50%, the preferred strategy is long-term antibiotics. However, the differences in outcomes are quite small even when osteomyelitis is a virtual certainty.
CONCLUSIONS:
Over the whole range of prior probabilities, the short-term strategy is the least expensive. At very low probabilities, it dominates the other strategies. When the likelihood of osteomyelitis is higher (10-20%), scanning results in outcomes and cost-effectiveness ratios comparable to those of immediate biopsy and is less invasive. When the probability of osteomyelitis is 50%, biopsy is quite cost-effective compared with all the other strategies (cost-effectiveness ratio = $15,502 per amputation averted) and is preferred to the scan strategy. When the confidence that a patient has osteomyelitis is very high (> 90% probability), the improved outcomes associated with long-term antibiotics are achieved with little additional expense and with favorable cost-effectiveness ratios compared with those of the other strategies.
AuthorsA I Mushlin, B Littenberg
JournalJournal of general internal medicine (J Gen Intern Med) Vol. 9 Issue 1 Pg. 1-7 (Jan 1994) ISSN: 0884-8734 [Print] United States
PMID7695670 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
Topics
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents (therapeutic use)
  • Biopsy
  • Bone and Bones (diagnostic imaging)
  • Cellulitis (drug therapy)
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Support Techniques
  • Foot Diseases (diagnosis, economics, epidemiology)
  • Humans
  • Osteomyelitis (diagnosis, economics, epidemiology)
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Probability
  • Radionuclide Imaging
  • Sensitivity and Specificity

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: