Abstract | STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of preincision wound infiltration with bupivacaine to wound infiltration at the end of the operation. DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. SETTING: University medical center. PATIENTS: 56 ASA status I and II women scheduled for abdominal hysterectomy were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. INTERVENTIONS: MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The opioid consumption was recorded for 4 days postoperatively. Pain scores were measured at 4 to 8-hour intervals using 100 mm visual analog scales. There was no difference in either the opioid analgesic requirements or the pain scores between the three study groups. CONCLUSIONS:
Wound infiltration, either preincision or postincision, had no clinically significant effect on the pain scores or analgesic requirements following abdominal hysterectomy.
|
Authors | R A Victory, N M Gajraj, A Van Elstraete, N A Pace, E R Johnson, P F White |
Journal | Journal of clinical anesthesia
(J Clin Anesth)
Vol. 7
Issue 3
Pg. 192-6
(May 1995)
ISSN: 0952-8180 [Print] United States |
PMID | 7669307
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
|
Topics |
- Adult
- Bupivacaine
(therapeutic use)
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Middle Aged
- Pain, Postoperative
(prevention & control)
- Postoperative Care
- Premedication
- Prospective Studies
|