Abstract | OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of burst abdomen and incisional hernia after three different techniques of closure of the abdominal wall after major gastrointestinal operations. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised, controlled trial. SETTING: University hospital, Norway. SUBJECTS: 599 adults who underwent major operations for gastrointestinal conditions between December 1990 and February 1992. INTERVENTIONS: MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Burst abdomen during the postoperative period, and incisional hernia after one year follow up. RESULTS: The incidence of wound dehiscence was 2% and of incisional hernia at one year 7%. There were no differences in the rate of dehiscence among the groups, but there were significantly more hernias in the polyglyconate group (19/164, 12%) compared with the two in which polyglactin 910 was used (16/327, 5%). Wound infections developed in 84/583 of our patients (14%) and the incidence was closely associated with emergency operations and contamination. Wound complications were not associated with the closure technique. CONCLUSIONS:
Wound infection is the most important single factor in the development of burst abdomen and incisional hernia. The continuous closure technique is quicker, cheaper, and as safe as the interrupted technique.
|
Authors | H Gislason, J E Grønbech, O Søreide |
Journal | The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica
(Eur J Surg)
Vol. 161
Issue 5
Pg. 349-54
(May 1995)
ISSN: 1102-4151 [Print] England |
PMID | 7662780
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Polymers
- Polyglactin 910
- polyglyconate
|
Topics |
- Aged
- Female
- Gastrointestinal Diseases
(surgery)
- Hernia, Ventral
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Humans
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Polyglactin 910
- Polymers
- Surgical Wound Dehiscence
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Suture Techniques
- Sutures
|