HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Comparative efficacy and safety of a once-daily loratadine-pseudoephedrine combination versus its components alone and placebo in the management of seasonal allergic rhinitis.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
The treatment of symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis often requires the use of a decongestant to improve nasal congestion, along with an antihistamine to adequately control other nasal, as well as nonnasal symptoms.
METHODS:
In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study, 874 patients with moderate to severe symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis were treated with one of the following: SCH 434 QD (a combination of 10 mg of loratadine in the coating and 240 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate in an extended-release core) once daily, 10 mg of loratadine once daily, 120 mg of pseudoephedrine sulfate every 12 hours, or placebo for 2 weeks.
RESULTS:
SCH 434 QD was consistently superior to placebo in controlling the symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis. Composite symptom scores (total, total nasal, and total nonnasal) were reduced significantly in patients treated with SCH 434 QD as compared with placebo (p < 0.01). When compared with its individual components, reductions in mean symptom scores were consistently greater, numerically, in patients treated with SCH 434 QD than in patients who were treated with either loratadine or pseudoephedrine alone. SCH 434 QD was superior to pseudoephedrine in reducing nonnasal symptoms at all time points (p < 0.01), and superior to loratadine in relieving nasal stuffiness at end point (p < 0.01). In the physicians' evaluation of therapeutic response, the SCH 434 QD group had the greatest number of patients with a good or excellent response at end point (58%). All treatments were generally well tolerated with no serious or unusual adverse events. Insomnia and nervousness, adverse events commonly associated with pseudoephedrine, were noted in a significantly greater number of patients treated with SCH 434 QD or pseudoephedrine (p < or = 0.04) as compared with those treated with loratadine or placebo.
CONCLUSIONS:
The results of the study demonstrate that SCH 434 QD is more effective than placebo or either of its components alone in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis.
AuthorsE Bronsky, P Boggs, S Findlay, S Gawchik, J Georgitis, H Mansmann, L Sholler, J Wolfe, E Meltzer, R Morris
JournalThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology (J Allergy Clin Immunol) Vol. 96 Issue 2 Pg. 139-47 (Aug 1995) ISSN: 0091-6749 [Print] United States
PMID7636050 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Loratadine
  • Ephedrine
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Child
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Drug Therapy, Combination
  • Ephedrine (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Loratadine (administration & dosage, adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Rhinitis, Allergic, Seasonal (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: