HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Randomized phase III trial of edatrexate versus methotrexate in patients with metastatic and/or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Head and Neck Cancer Cooperative Group study.

AbstractPURPOSE:
To compared the response rates and the toxicity of the new antifolate edatrexate (EDX) with that of methotrexate (MTX) in a randomized trial in patients with metastatic or recurrent squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCC) and to compare the durations of response and survival.
PATIENTS AND METHODS:
Two hundred seventy-three patients with SCC were randomized to receive either EDX or MTX as a weekly intravenous (IV) bolus injection. Doses of EDX were initially 80 mg/m2/wk, but because of the toxicity, this was later reduced to 70 mg/m2/wk. MTX was administered at a dose of 40 mg/m2/wk throughout. In both arms, two dose increments of 10% were scheduled in case of no toxicity.
RESULTS:
Of 264 eligible patients, 131 were treated with EDX and 133 with MTX. There were five treatment-related deaths: four on EDX and one on MTX. Overall, toxicity was similar in both arms; however, stomatitis, skin toxicity, and hair loss were more pronounced on the EDX arm. The overall response rate was 21% (six complete responses [CRs] and 21 partial responses [PRs]) for EDX and 16% (nine CRs and 12 PRs) for MTX (P = .392). Responses were mainly seen in patients with locoregional disease. Tumors that originated from the hypopharynx responded poorly in comparison to tumors from other sites. The median duration of response was 6.1 months for EDX and 6.4 months for MTX (log-rank P = .262). There was no difference in overall or progression-free survival. The median survival duration was 6 months on both treatment groups.
CONCLUSIONS:
Both EDX and MTX are moderately active against SCC. In this large phase III study, response rates, time to treatment failure, and overall survival appeared to be similar for both antifolates. However, EDX had more side effects than MTX and therefore cannot be recommended for routine palliative treatment of patients with SCC.
AuthorsJ H Schornagel, J Verweij, P H de Mulder, F Cognetti, J B Vermorken, P Cappelaere, J P Armand, J Wildiers, A de Graeff, M Clavel
JournalJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (J Clin Oncol) Vol. 13 Issue 7 Pg. 1649-55 (Jul 1995) ISSN: 0732-183X [Print] United States
PMID7602354 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Antineoplastic Agents
  • edatrexate
  • Aminopterin
  • Methotrexate
Topics
  • Agranulocytosis (chemically induced, mortality)
  • Aminopterin (adverse effects, analogs & derivatives, therapeutic use)
  • Antineoplastic Agents (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell (drug therapy, mortality, pathology, secondary)
  • Drug Administration Schedule
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms (drug therapy, mortality, pathology)
  • Humans
  • Injections, Intravenous
  • Lung (drug effects)
  • Male
  • Methotrexate (therapeutic use)
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome (chemically induced)
  • Thrombocytopenia (chemically induced, mortality)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: