First-line treatment in acute non-dysenteric diarrhoea: clinical comparison of loperamide oxide, loperamide and placebo. UK Janssen Research Group of General Practitioners.
|
| Abstract |
The use of antimicrobial agents for the treatment of acute diarrhoea has become more common with the introduction of quinolone compounds, which are active against most types of bacterial pathogens. Despite the fact that such drugs have been used for empirical therapy or even for prophylaxis, current opinion would restrict their use to specific groups of patients who are likely to show particular benefit from them. Non-specific therapy seems a more appropriate initial treatment for cases of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea. Clinical trial data are presented here comparing the effects of loperamide oxide 1 and 2 mg to those of placebo and loperamide 2 mg in this condition. All the drug preparations were significantly superior to placebo, in particular reducing the time to complete relief of symptoms to about 24 hours, as opposed to 45 hours on placebo treatment. Of these preparations, loperamide oxide 1 mg is to be preferred, as it produces fewer constipation-like episodes after treatment. The introduction of loperamide oxide 1 mg represents a useful advance in the non-specific treatment of acute, non-dysenteric diarrhoea.
|
|---|---|
| Authors | I W Hughes |
| Journal | The British journal of clinical practice (Br J Clin Pract) 1995 Jul-Aug Vol. 49 Issue 4 Pg. 181-5 ISSN: 0007-0947 [Print] England |
| PMID | 7547157 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial) |
| Chemical References |
|
| Topics |
|
Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!