A comparison of diazepam and phenoperidine in premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a randomized double blind controlled study.

Abstract

A variety of agents are used as premedication for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (U.G.E.). To our knowledge, no double blind studies have been performed to compare their value. In this study phenoperidine (2 mg i.v.) was compared with diazepam (t mg i.v.) in 200 consecutive patients undergoing elective U.G.E. The study was randomized and double blind in regard to both endoscopists and patients. All patients were given atropine (0.4 mg i.v.) and a throat spray with 2% amethocaine. Patients who needed supplemental medication were given diazepam and excluded from final analysis. A graded questionnaire was recorded by endoscopists and patients after U.G.E., and a further anonymous questionnaire was returned by patients four days later. Statistical analysis revealed that phenoperidine was superior at facilitating intubation and providing more relaxation as judged by the endoscopist. Patient questionnaires, four days after U.G.E., indicated less distress during intubation and examination with phenoperidine. Nausea, vomiting, amnesia and phlebitis were uncommon after either phenoperidine or diazepam.

• Authors: D Werner, R N Ratnaike, M J Lawson, J Barrie, J Streeter, T Read, A K Grant
• Journal: European journal of clinical pharmacology (Eur J Clin Pharmacol) Vol. 22 Issue 2 Pg. 143-5 ( 1982) ISSN: 0031-6970 [Print] Germany
• PMID: 7047171 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)

Chemical References

• Phenoperidine
• Diazepam

Topics

• Clinical Trials as Topic
• Diazepam (therapeutic use)
• Double-Blind Method
• Female
• Gastroscopy
• Humans
• Male
• Middle Aged
• Phenoperidine (therapeutic use)
• Premedication
• Random Allocation