HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

[Sodium salts or methylglucamine salts in contrast media for infusion pyelography? (author's transl)].

Abstract
Tolerance of two contrast media was compared by a double blind study. High doses of iodine (45 g) were used for both contrast substances. Sodium Ioglicinate was giving best radiological contrast but produced more side-effects, especially nausea, as compared to Methylglucamine-Ioglicinate. On the contrary Methylglucamine-Ioglicinate did not give best density but did produce less side-effects. Thus the investigator has to consider very carefully, which of the compounds has to be preferred.
AuthorsV Taenzer, A Albrecht, W Clauss, I Held
JournalDer Radiologe (Radiologe) Vol. 21 Issue 6 Pg. 288-90 (Jun 1981) ISSN: 0033-832X [Print] Germany
Vernacular TitleNatrium- oder Methylglukaminsalze der Kontrastmittel für die Infusionsurographie?
PMID7022552 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, English Abstract, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Contrast Media
  • Iothalamic Acid
  • ioglicic acid
  • Meglumine
  • meglumine ioglicinate
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Contrast Media (adverse effects)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Humans
  • Iothalamic Acid (adverse effects, analogs & derivatives)
  • Meglumine (adverse effects, analogs & derivatives)
  • Middle Aged
  • Urography (methods)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: