HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Evaluation of a new cephalosporin antibiotic, cephapirin.

Abstract
Cephapirin sodium, a parenterally administered derivative of cephalosporanic acid, was tested in vitro against 150 stock cultures of Enterobacteriaceae and 30 stock cultures each of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Both broth- and agar-dilution techniques were employed with two sizes of inocula of organisms. At a concentration of 7.5 mug or less/ml, cephapirin inhibited and killed 100% of strains of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis and more than 80% of Klebsiella species when tested against an inoculum of 10(5) bacterial cells/ml. However, even at 100 mug/ml, only a few isolates of other Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas were inhibited. A 100-fold increase in the inoculum resulted in decreased susceptibility of organisms. All penicillin-susceptible as well as penicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates were inhibited and killed by 5 mug or less of cephapirin/ml when tested with an inoculum of either 10(4) or 10(6) organisms/ml. The drug also was studied in various doses in the treatment of 77 patients with diverse infections. Cephapirin was effective in the treatment of 27 of 32 patients with pulmonary infection, as well as in 6 of 7 patients with staphylococcal or streptococcal soft tissue infection. Of 25 patients with urinary-tract infections, 19 developed a negative culture during therapy. A single 4-g intramuscular dose of cephapirin was effective in only 2 of 11 patients with gonococcal urethritis or endocervicitis. Two patients with gonococcal urethritis treated with multiple injections were cured. The drug was well tolerated except for pain at the site of injection in 14 patients and phlebitis in 4 patients. No abnormalities in renal or hepatic function could be attributed to cephapirin. In addition, no abnormalities were found in the renal tubules of rabbits challenged with 500 mg of cephapirin/kg. If further studies document that cephapirin is well tolerated by the parenteral route, it may have advantages over cephalothin or cephaloridine.
AuthorsP Wiesner, R MacGregor, D Bear, S Berman, K Holmes, M Turck
JournalAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy (Antimicrob Agents Chemother) Vol. 1 Issue 4 Pg. 303-9 (Apr 1972) ISSN: 0066-4804 [Print] United States
PMID4208896 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Acetamides
  • Cephalosporins
  • Pyridines
  • Sulfides
Topics
  • Acetamides (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Animals
  • Bacteria (drug effects)
  • Cephalosporins (adverse effects, pharmacology, therapeutic use)
  • Clinical Trials as Topic
  • Enterobacteriaceae (drug effects)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Kidney Tubules (drug effects)
  • Lung Diseases (drug therapy)
  • Male
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Middle Aged
  • Pseudomonas aeruginosa (drug effects)
  • Pyridines (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Rabbits
  • Staphylococcus (drug effects)
  • Sulfides (adverse effects, therapeutic use)
  • Urinary Tract Infections (drug therapy)

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: