Abstract |
A prospective randomized study was conducted to compare the antiemetic efficacy of metoclopramide (MCP) versus its recent derivative alizapride (ALZ) in patients undergoing cancer chemotherapy. Both drugs were given at a dose of 2 mg/kg i.v. push for 5 doses. A positive response was defined as absence of nausea or emesis, or moderate nausea with one or two emeses per day. Eighty-two patients were evaluable. Forty-two received MCP and 40 received ALZ. A positive response was observed in 54% MCP-treated and 41% ALZ-treated patients. Neurologic toxicity, mainly extrapyramidal disturbances, was the most remarkable adverse side effect; it occurred more frequently in the MCP-treated group (31%) than in the ALZ-treated group (17%). Both drugs were found to be more effective in previously untreated patients and when employed together with steroids. MCP was more effective (52% positive response) than ALZ (41% positive response) in cisplatin-treated patients. To better control drug-induced vomiting, we believe that future trials should evaluate slow i.v. infusion of antiemetic agents and their combination with dexamethasone.
|
Authors | M Zambetti, E Bajetta, P Bidoli, C Verusio |
Journal | Tumori
(Tumori)
Vol. 71
Issue 6
Pg. 609-14
(Dec 31 1985)
ISSN: 0300-8916 [Print] United States |
PMID | 4082295
(Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Comparative Study, Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)
|
Chemical References |
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Pyrrolidines
- Metoclopramide
- alizapride
|
Topics |
- Adolescent
- Adult
- Aged
- Antineoplastic Agents
(adverse effects)
- Drug Evaluation
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Metoclopramide
(therapeutic use)
- Middle Aged
- Prospective Studies
- Pyrrolidines
(therapeutic use)
- Random Allocation
- Vomiting
(chemically induced, drug therapy)
|