HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

A comparison of enteric-coated aspirin granules with plain and buffered aspirin: a report of two studies.

Abstract
Reported herein are two endoscopic studies performed to compare the gastrointestinal mucosal effects of encapsulated enteric-coated aspirin granules with several other well-known aspirin products. The first study compared the effects of Ascriptin A/D, Bayer, Bufferin, and 325 mg enteric-coated aspirin granules (325 mg Ecotrin capsules); the second study compared Anacin Arthritis Pain Formula, Arthritis Strength Bufferin, Ascriptin A/D, Bayer, and 500 mg enteric-coated aspirin granules (500 mg Ecotrin capsule). In both of these studies the Ecotrin capsule induced less stomach damage than did any of the other aspirin products tested. The Ecotrin capsule was also shown to cause less damage to the proximal duodenum than did Bayer.
AuthorsD Petroski
JournalThe American journal of gastroenterology (Am J Gastroenterol) Vol. 81 Issue 1 Pg. 26-8 (Jan 1986) ISSN: 0002-9270 [Print] United States
PMID3942122 (Publication Type: Comparative Study, Journal Article)
Chemical References
  • Buffers
  • Tablets, Enteric-Coated
  • Aspirin
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aspirin (administration & dosage, adverse effects)
  • Buffers
  • Duodenum (drug effects)
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Patient Compliance
  • Stomach (drug effects)
  • Tablets, Enteric-Coated
  • Time Factors

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: