Abstract |
Our study aims to compare the utility of single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) with dual antiplatelet therapy ( DAPT) following Left atrial appendage occlusion in patients whose post-procedural oral anticoagulation therapy was deemed high-risk or contraindicated. A total of 14 observational studies with 3,151 patients were included. Our study demonstrates that SAPT and DAPT were similar in preventing device-related thrombosis. Although SAPT and DAPT had a tendency toward a higher risk for stroke and major bleeding respectively, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Large-scale Randomized Controlled Studies are warranted to validate if our results could be translated into clinical practice.
|
Authors | Mohammed Mhanna, Azizullah Beran, Ahmad Al-Abdouh, Ahmad Jabri, Ahmad Al-Aaraj, Omar Sajdeya, Ziad Abuhelwa, Waleed Khokher, Sapan Bhuta, Cameron J Burmeister, Ehab A Eltahawy |
Journal | Current problems in cardiology
(Curr Probl Cardiol)
Vol. 47
Issue 9
Pg. 101269
(Sep 2022)
ISSN: 1535-6280 [Electronic] United States |
PMID | 35644502
(Publication Type: Journal Article, Review)
|
Copyright | Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. |
Chemical References |
- Anticoagulants
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
|
Topics |
- Anticoagulants
(adverse effects)
- Atrial Appendage
(surgery)
- Atrial Fibrillation
(complications, drug therapy)
- Drug Therapy, Combination
- Hemorrhage
(chemically induced, drug therapy)
- Humans
- Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors
(adverse effects)
- Stroke
(etiology, prevention & control)
- Treatment Outcome
|