HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Evaluating Primary Endpoints for COVID-19 Therapeutic Trials to Assess Recovery.

Abstract
Rationale: Uncertainty regarding the natural history of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) led to difficulty in efficacy endpoint selection for therapeutic trials. Capturing outcomes that occur after hospital discharge may improve assessment of clinical recovery among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Objectives: Evaluate 90-day clinical course of patients hospitalized with COVID-19, comparing three distinct definitions of recovery. Methods: We used pooled data from three clinical trials of neutralizing monoclonal antibodies to compare: 1) the hospital discharge approach; 2) the TICO (Therapeutics for Inpatients with COVID-19) trials sustained recovery approach; and 3) a comprehensive approach. At the time of enrollment, all patients were hospitalized in a non-ICU setting without organ failure or major extrapulmonary manifestations of COVID-19. We defined discordance as a difference between time to recovery. Measurements and Main Results: Discordance between the hospital discharge and comprehensive approaches occurred in 170 (20%) of 850 enrolled participants, including 126 hospital readmissions and 24 deaths after initial hospital discharge. Discordant participants were older (median age, 68 vs. 59 years; P < 0.001) and more had a comorbidity (84% vs. 70%; P < 0.001). Of 170 discordant participants, 106 (62%) had postdischarge events captured by the TICO approach. Conclusions: Among patients hospitalized with COVID-19, 20% had clinically significant postdischarge events within 90 days after randomization in patients who would be considered "recovered" using the hospital discharge approach. Using the TICO approach balances length of follow-up with practical limitations. However, clinical trials of COVID-19 therapeutics should use follow-up times up to 90 days to assess clinical recovery more accurately.
AuthorsDavid J Douin, Lianne Siegel, Greg Grandits, Andrew Phillips, Neil R Aggarwal, Jason Baker, Samuel M Brown, Christina C Chang, Anna L Goodman, Birgit Grund, Elizabeth S Higgs, Catherine L Hough, Daniel D Murray, Roger Paredes, Mahesh Parmar, Sarah Pett, Mark N Polizzotto, Uriel Sandkovsky, Wesley H Self, Barnaby E Young, Abdel G Babiker, Victoria J Davey, Virginia Kan, Annetine C Gelijns, Gail Matthews, B Taylor Thompson, H Clifford Lane, James D Neaton, Jens D Lundgren, Adit A Ginde
JournalAmerican journal of respiratory and critical care medicine (Am J Respir Crit Care Med) Vol. 206 Issue 6 Pg. 730-739 (09 15 2022) ISSN: 1535-4970 [Electronic] United States
PMID35580040 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural, Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.)
Chemical References
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
Topics
  • Aftercare
  • Aged
  • Antibodies, Monoclonal
  • COVID-19
  • Humans
  • Patient Discharge
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: