This study evaluated clinical outcomes of switching from
clopidogrel to
ticagrelor in patients with
acute coronary syndrome (ACS) undergoing
percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The clinical benefit of in-hospital switching from
clopidogrel to
ticagrelor in these patients remains unclear. Among patients with ACS initially receiving
clopidogrel, logistic regression was used to identify independent predictors of switching to
ticagrelor. Multivariable Cox regression was used to compare efficacy and safety between switching to
ticagrelor and continuing
clopidogrel. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACEs) at 12 months, a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (
MACE) and
Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 2/3/5
bleeding. Among 10,519 patients initially receiving
clopidogrel, 1405 (13.4%) were switched to
ticagrelor at discharge.
Stent number, left main artery lesions, diabetes, male sex, age, estimated glomerular filtration rate of <45 ml/min/1.73 m2 , and history of PCI or
stroke were identified as independent predictors of switching to
ticagrelor. The rate of NACE (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.51; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.18-1.91) or BARC type 2/3/5
bleeding (HR: 2.01; 95% CI: 1.52-2.66) was significantly higher in patients switching to
ticagrelor than in those continuing
clopidogrel. The risk of
MACE was comparable between both the groups (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.41-1.22). In real-world practice, in-hospital switching from
clopidogrel to
ticagrelor was independently associated with several clinical factors. Patients switching to
ticagrelor had a higher rate of NACE or BARC type 2/3/5
bleeding than those continuing
clopidogrel, without any reduction in the
MACE rate.