HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Long-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization Combined With Radiofrequency Ablation as an Initial Treatment for Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

AbstractImportance:
The long-term outcomes of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are not determined.
Objective:
To report the long-term outcomes of TACE-RFA.
Design, Setting, and Participants:
This cohort study analyzed long-term follow-up data from a phase 3 randomized clinical trial of adults with early HCC conducted from October 2006 to June 2009. Participants were randomly assigned to the TACE-RFA group or the RFA group in a 1:1 ratio and followed up approximately 6 years after the trial was closed. Data analysis was performed March 2020.
Exposure:
In the TACE-RFA group, TACE was performed first, and RFA was done 2 weeks later.
Main Outcomes and Measures:
Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS).
Results:
Of 189 patients who were included (mean [SD] age, 54.3 [12.0] years; 146 [77.2%] men), 94 and 95 patients were assigned to the TACE-RFA group and RFA group, respectively, with their baseline characteristics well matched. Three patients in each group were lost to follow-up. The 5-year and 7-year OS rates for the TACE-RFA group vs the RFA group were 52.0% and 36.4% vs 43.2% and 19.4%, respectively (hazard ratio [HR], 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39-0.78; P = .001). The 5-year and 7-year RFS rates for the TACE-RFA group vs the RFA group were 41.4% and 34.5% vs 27.4% and 18.1%, respectively (HR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.49-0.89; P = .007). On subgroup analysis comparing patients who had tumors larger than 3 cm with those who had tumors 3 cm or smaller, the OS and RFS survival rates in the TACE-RFA group (HR, 3.20; 95% CI, 1.91-5.35, P < .001) were significantly better than those in the RFA group (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.30-3.17; P = .002).
Conclusions and Relevance:
In this cohort study, combined RFA and TACE was associated with better survival than RFA alone on long-term follow-up. Patients with tumors 3 cm or smaller did not benefit as well as patients with tumors larger than 3 cm from the combined treatment.
AuthorsYao Jun Zhang, Min Shan Chen, Yong Chen, Wan Yee Lau, Zhenwei Peng
JournalJAMA network open (JAMA Netw Open) Vol. 4 Issue 9 Pg. e2126992 (09 01 2021) ISSN: 2574-3805 [Electronic] United States
PMID34570206 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Topics
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Carcinoma, Hepatocellular (mortality, therapy)
  • Catheter Ablation
  • Chemoembolization, Therapeutic (methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • China (epidemiology)
  • Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
  • Cohort Studies
  • Combined Modality Therapy (methods)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Liver Neoplasms (mortality, therapy)
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Radiofrequency Ablation (methods, statistics & numerical data)
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: