HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in evaluating the treatment efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Results of a dual-center study.

AbstractBACKGROUND:
An accurate evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment is important to maximize the prognostic benefit of this strategy in each individual patient. The main aim of the present study is to investigate the difference between carbohydrate antigen 19-9 and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) in evaluating the response to neoadjuvant treatment for resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients.
METHODS:
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with positive standard uptake values (SUV) on FDG-PET before neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NACRT) were enrolled (n = 141). In all patients, CA19-9 and FDG-PET were evaluated before the initiation of and after the completion of NACRT. The statuses of CA19-9 and FDG uptake alterations during NACRT were assessed in association with survival and tumor recurrence profiles.
RESULTS:
A favorable response in each CA19-9 and FDG-PET was significantly related to better survival, respectively, than the unfavorable response (44.3% vs 19.5%, P < .001 and 45.8% vs 24.6%, P < .001). The status of CA19-9 was significantly associated with the incidence of distant recurrence whereas the status of FDG-PET was significantly associated with the incidence of local recurrence, and only patients with a favorable response in both CA19-9 and PET statuses showed a significantly better survival than the others (5-year survival: 56% vs 24%, P < .001), and those with unfavorable response in either of CA19-9 or PET status showed similar poor survival to those with unfavorable in both (P = .164).
CONCLUSION:
CA19-9 and PET evaluation provided oncologically different risk assessments in terms of tumor recurrence profile, and favorable response in both CA19-9 and FDG-PET were necessary to achieve prognostic benefit from NACRT.
AuthorsHirofumi Akita, Hidenori Takahashi, Hidetoshi Eguchi, Kei Asukai, Shinichiro Hasegawa, Hiroshi Wada, Yoshifumi Iwagami, Daisaku Yamada, Yoshito Tomimaru, Takehiro Noda, Kunihito Gotoh, Shogo Kobayashi, Yuichiro Doki, Masato Sakon
JournalAnnals of gastroenterological surgery (Ann Gastroenterol Surg) Vol. 5 Issue 3 Pg. 381-389 (May 2021) ISSN: 2475-0328 [Electronic] Japan
PMID34095729 (Publication Type: Journal Article)
Copyright© 2020 The Authors. Annals of Gastroenterological Surgery published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Society of Gastroenterological Surgery.

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: