HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Efficacy and Safety of Rebamipide versus Its New Formulation, AD-203, in Patients with Erosive Gastritis: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Active Control, Noninferiority, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study.

AbstractBackground/Aims:
: The mucoprotective drug rebamipide is used to treat gastritis and peptic ulcers. We compared the efficacy of MucostaⓇ (rebamipide 100 mg) and its new formulation, AD-203 (rebamipide 150 mg), in treating erosive gastritis.
Methods:
This double-blind, active control, noninferiority, multicenter, phase 3 clinical trial randomly assigned 475 patients with endoscopically proven erosive gastritis to two groups: AD-203 twice daily or MucostaⓇ thrice daily for 2 weeks. The intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis included 454 patients (AD-203, n=229; MucostaⓇ, n=225), and the per-protocol (PP) analysis included 439 patients (AD-203, n=224; MucostaⓇ, n=215). The posttreatment assessments included the primary (erosion improvement rate) and secondary endpoints (erosion and edema cure rates; improvement rates of redness, hemorrhage, and gastrointestinal symptoms). Drug-related adverse events were evaluated.
Results:
According to the ITT analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.7% and 43.8%, respectively. According to the PP analysis, the erosion improvement rates (posttreatment) in AD-203-treated and MucostaⓇ-treated patients were 39.3% and 43.7%, respectively. The one-sided 97.5% lower limit for the improvement rate difference between the study groups was -4.01% (95% confidence interval [CI], -13.09% to 5.06%) in the ITT analysis and -4.44% (95% CI, -13.65% to 4.78%) in the PP analysis. The groups did not significantly differ in the secondary endpoints in either analysis. Twenty-four AD-203-treated and 20 MucostaⓇ-treated patients reported adverse events but no serious adverse drug reactions; both groups presented similar adverse event rates.
Conclusions:
The new formulation of rebamipide 150 mg (AD-203) twice daily was not inferior to rebamipide 100 mg (MucostaⓇ) thrice daily. Both formulations showed a similar efficacy in treating erosive gastritis.
AuthorsGwang Ha Kim, Hang Lak Lee, Moon Kyung Joo, Hong Jun Park, Sung Woo Jung, Ok-Jae Lee, Hyungkil Kim, Hoon Jai Chun, Soo Teik Lee, Ji Won Kim, Han Ho Jeon, Il-Kwun Chung, Hyun-Soo Kim, Dong Ho Lee, Kyoung-Oh Kim, Yun Jeong Lim, Seun-Ja Park, Soo-Jeong Cho, Byung-Wook Kim, Kwang Hyun Ko, Seong Woo Jeon, Jae Gyu Kim, In-Kyung Sung, Tae Nyeun Kim, Jae Kyu Sung, Jong-Jae Park
JournalGut and liver (Gut Liver) Vol. 15 Issue 6 Pg. 841-850 (11 15 2021) ISSN: 2005-1212 [Electronic] Korea (South)
PMID33827990 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Phase III, Journal Article, Multicenter Study, Randomized Controlled Trial)
Chemical References
  • Quinolones
  • rebamipide
  • Alanine
Topics
  • Alanine (analogs & derivatives)
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Gastritis (drug therapy)
  • Humans
  • Quinolones (adverse effects)
  • Stomach Ulcer
  • Treatment Outcome

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: