Patients with FH were recruited by a network of Greek sites participating in the HELLAS-FH registry.
LDL-C levels were calculated using the Friedewald (
LDL-CF) and the Martin/Hopkins (
LDL-CM/H) equations as well as after correcting
LDL-CM/H for Lp(a) levels [
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H]. The objective was to compare
LDL-C levels and target achievement as estimated by different methods in FH patients.
RESULTS: This analysis included 1620 patients (1423 adults and 197 children). In adults at diagnosis,
LDL-CF and
LDL-CM/H levels were similar [235 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L) vs 235 ± 69 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L), respectively; P = NS], while
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were non-significantly lower than
LDL-CF [211 ± 61 mg/dL (5.5 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P = 0.432]. In treated adults (n = 966) both
LDL-CF [150 ± 71 mg/dL (3.9 ± 1.8 mmol/L)] and
LDL-CM/H levels [151 ± 70 mg/dL (6.1 ± 1.8 mmol/L); P = 0.746] were similar, whereas
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H levels were significantly lower than
LDL-CF [121 ± 62 mg/dL (3.1 ± 1.6 mmol/L); P < 0.001]. Target achievement as per latest guidelines in treated patients using the
LDL-CM/H (2.5%) and especially
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (10.7%) were significantly different than
LDL-CF (2.9%; P < 0.001). In children, all 3 formulas resulted in similar
LDL-C levels, both at diagnosis and in treated patients. However, target achievement by
LDL-CF was lower compared with
LDL-CM/H and
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H methods (22.1 vs 24.8 vs 33.3%; P < 0.001 for both comparisons).
CONCLUSION:
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H results in significantly lower values and higher target achievement rate in both treated adults and children. If validated in clinical trials,
LDL-CLp(a)corM/H may become the method of choice to more accurately estimate 'true'
LDL-C levels in FH patients.