[Emergency care of patients with myocardial infarction: from the onset of symptoms until opening the vessel].

Abstract

Introduction and aim: The authors analyse emergency care data for 6878 patients treated for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) using data from the Hungarian Myocardial Infarction Registry (HUMIR) and the National Ambulance Service (NAS). Method: Patients received treatment between 01/01/2017 and 31/12/2018, and all patients underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI): 47.5% of patients had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 3614 patients (52.5%) had non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction. The time between the beginning of the complaint and notification of NAS was regarded as the patient delay (PD). The time from the notification of NAS until arrival on the scene (M1), that of the on-site care (M2) and of the transport from the scene to the hospital (M3) were recorded. In-hospital care was evaluated from admission until opening the vessel ("door to balloon time"). The results were also broken down by counties. The median values and the quartiles (Q1, Q3) were given when the time was reported. Results: Patient delay in both types of infarction was unfavourably long: 101 minutes for STEMI and 687 minutes for NSTEMI. Immediate ambulance action was recorded in 58.7% for STEMI patients and 43.7% for NSTEMI patients. In both types of myocardial infarction, the median M1 time was 13 minutes, on-site care (M2) was 23 minutes, and M3 time was 30 minutes. In patients treated for STEMI, the time from hospital admission until opening the infarct-related artery was 37 minutes, and the total ischemic time was 243 minutes. In 9.5% of STEMI patients, the infarct-related artery was opened within 2 hours, in 49.1% within 4 hours, and in 88.1% within 12 hours. Significant differences were found between the counties for each of the periods examined. Conclusions: The PD is currently the biggest problem in providing optimal care timely for myocardial infarction patients. There are significant regional differences in rescue times, and further analysis is needed to investigate the causes. Orv Hetil. 2020; 161(12): 458-467.

• Authors: András Jánosi, Gábor Csató, Ferenc Péter Pach, Sándor Guti, György Pápai, Gergely Erdős, Géza Fontos, Péter Andréka
• Journal: Orvosi hetilap (Orv Hetil) Vol. 161 Issue 12 Pg. 458-467 (Mar 2020) ISSN: 1788-6120 [Electronic] Hungary
• Vernacular Title: Szívinfarktus miatt kezelt betegek sürgősségi ellátása: a panasz kezdetétől az ér megnyitásáig.
• PMID: 32172587 (Publication Type: Journal Article)

Topics

• Emergency Medical Services (statistics & numerical data)
• Humans
• Hungary
• Myocardial Infarction (diagnosis, surgery)
• Patient Transfer (methods)
• Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
• Time Factors
• Time-to-Treatment (statistics & numerical data)
• Treatment Outcome