The effect of distraction techniques on pain and stress during labor: a randomized controlled clinical trial.

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Pain control and the stress associated with labor and delivery are among the most important issues of health care system. Use of distraction techniques during childbirth is reported to reduce pain and stress of labor. However, there is a limited publication that looked on the effect of distraction techniques on labor pain and stress. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of distraction techniques on labor pain and stress (primary outcomes), fear of childbirth, length of delivery stages, first minute Apgar score and oxytocin consumption (secondary outcomes).

METHODS:

A randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on 68 pregnant women. Participants were allocated into two groups (intervention and control groups) by blocked randomization. Participants in the intervention group received distraction techniques in four sessions. Questionnaires of Fear of Childbirth (W-DEQ version A) and PSS once were completed before intervention and again at the 36th week for the W-DEQ and in the active phase for the PSS through interviews. The pain was assessed through VAS during active phase per hour. The length of delivery stages was recorded in the partograph chart. Data were analyzed by independent t-test and ANCOVA.

RESULTS:

The mean of perceived stress during labor in the intervention group was significantly less than that of the control group (AMD: -3.2; 95% CI: - 0.8 to - 6.0; P = 0.01). The mean (SD) of pain intensity during labor was less than in the intervention and control groups compare to the control group (6.2 vs 7.5; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of fear of childbirth score (AMD: 5.3; 95% CI: 13.0 to - 6.0; P = - 2.3). Moreover, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in terms of the active phase of labor (P = 0.504), second stage of delivery (P = 0.928), total length of delivery (P = 0.520), Apgar score (P = 1.000) and frequency of oxytocin consumption (P = 0.622).

CONCLUSION:

According to the results, distraction techniques can reduce the pain and stress of labor, but further studies by using the distraction techniques are needed to reach a decisive conclusion.

TRIAL REGISTRATION:

IRCT2017042910324N39; Name of registry: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials; Registered 11 September 2017. URL of registry: https://fa.irct.ir/user/trial/10814/view. Date of enrolment of the first participant to the trial: September 2017.

• Authors: Paria Amiri, Mojgan Mirghafourvand, Khalil Esmaeilpour, Mahin Kamalifard, Reyhaneh Ivanbagha
• Journal: BMC pregnancy and childbirth (BMC Pregnancy Childbirth) Vol. 19 Issue 1 Pg. 534 (Dec 30 2019) ISSN: 1471-2393 [Electronic] England
• PMID: 31888543 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Randomized Controlled Trial)

Chemical References

• Oxytocin

Topics

• Adult
• Fear
• Female
• Humans
• Iran
• Labor Pain (psychology, therapy)
• Labor, Obstetric (psychology)
• Oxytocin (therapeutic use)
• Pain Management (methods, psychology)
• Parturition (psychology)
• Pregnancy
• Pregnant Women (psychology)
• Treatment Outcome
• Young Adult