HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Outcomes of Patients with Recurrent and Refractory Lymphoma Undergoing Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation with BEAM Conditioning and Sirolimus- and Tacrolimus-Based GVHD Prophylaxis.

Abstract
The current standard of care for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is high-dose conditioning followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). For some patients (ie, those with highest-risk disease, insufficient stem cell numbers after mobilization, or bone marrow involvement) allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) offers the potential for cure. However, the majority of patients undergoing alloHCT receive reduced-intensity conditioning as a preparative regimen, and studies assessing outcomes of patients after alloHCT with myeloablative conditioning are limited. In this retrospective study, we reviewed outcomes of 22 patients with recurrent and refractory NHL who underwent alloHCT with myeloablative BEAM conditioning and received tacrolimus/sirolimus as graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis at City of Hope between 2005 and 2018. With a median follow-up of 2.6 years (range, 1.0 to 11.2 years), the probabilities of 2-year overall survival and event-free survival were 58.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 35.0% to 75.8%) and 45.5% (95% CI, 24.4% to 64.3%), respectively. The cumulative incidence of grade II to IV acute GVHD was 45.5% (95% CI, 23.8% to 64.9%), with only 1 patient developing grade IV acute GVHD. However, chronic GVHD was seen in 55% of the patients (n = 12). Of the 22 eligible patients, 2 had undergone previous ASCT and 2 had undergone previous alloHCT. Both patients with previous ASCT developed severe regimen-related toxicity. Patients who underwent alloHCT with chemorefractory disease had lower survival rates, with 1-year OS and EFS of 44.4% and 33.0%, respectively. In conclusion, alloHCT with a BEAM preparative regimen and tacrolimus/sirolimus-based GVHD should be considered as an alternative option for patients with highest-risk lymphoma whose outcomes are expectedly poor after ASCT.
AuthorsAmandeep Salhotra, Matthew Mei, Tracey Stiller, Sally Mokhtari, Alex F Herrera, Robert Chen, Leslie Popplewell, Jasmine Zain, Haris Ali, Karamjeet Sandhu, Elizabeth Budde, Auayporn Nademanee, Stephen J Forman, Ryotaro Nakamura
JournalBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (Biol Blood Marrow Transplant) Vol. 25 Issue 2 Pg. 287-292 (02 2019) ISSN: 1523-6536 [Electronic] United States
PMID30227232 (Publication Type: Clinical Trial, Journal Article, Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural)
CopyrightCopyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Chemical References
  • Cytarabine
  • Podophyllotoxin
  • Melphalan
  • Carmustine
  • Sirolimus
  • Tacrolimus
Topics
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Allografts
  • Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols (administration & dosage)
  • Carmustine (administration & dosage)
  • Cytarabine (administration & dosage)
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Graft vs Host Disease (mortality, prevention & control)
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Lymphoma (mortality, therapy)
  • Male
  • Melphalan (administration & dosage)
  • Middle Aged
  • Podophyllotoxin (administration & dosage)
  • Sirolimus (administration & dosage)
  • Survival Rate
  • Tacrolimus (administration & dosage)
  • Transplantation Conditioning

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: