HOMEPRODUCTSCOMPANYCONTACTFAQResearchDictionaryPharmaSign Up FREE or Login

Effect of recombinant GM-CSF and recombinant G-CSF on colony formation of blast progenitors in acute myeloblastic leukemia.

Abstract
The colony-promoting activities of recombinant granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (rGM-CSF) and recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) on primary and secondary colony formation by blast progenitors (leukemic colony-forming units [L-CFU]) from 21 patients with acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) were examined using blast colony assay and compared to colony promotion stimulated by phytohemagglutinin-stimulated leukocyte-conditioned medium (PHA-LCM). Recombinant GM-CSF stimulated blast colonies in 13 out of 20 cases examined (1 case not done). The magnitude of stimulation by rGM-CSF varied significantly according to the type of AML, but in general was lower than that of PHA-LCM. Blast cells of type M1 did not form any colonies with rGM-CSF, although numerous colonies were produced with PHA-LCM. Type M4 blasts formed fairly large numbers of colonies, though slightly less than those stimulated by PHA-LCM. Blasts of type M2 and M5 formed colonies with the stimulation of rGM-CSF, but the numbers were considerably smaller than type M4 and those stimulated with PHA-LCM. Recombinant G-CSF stimulated blast colonies in only 5 out of 21 cases, 3 of them being type M2. The number of cases responding to rG-CSF was significantly smaller than that responding to rGM-CSF, and even in cases in which colonies were formed, the magnitude of stimulation was minimal. From these results it seems likely that blast cells of different types of AML require a different kind of CSF for their optimal growth; type M4 blasts responded to the stimulation of rGM-CSF well, but blasts of other types of AML responded poorly. Thus, except for type M4, CSF(s) other than rGM-CSF seems to be required for the sufficient growth of L-CFU. Recombinant G-CSF is not likely to play an essential role in the proliferation of leukemic blasts of most types. Previous exposure to rGM-CSF and rG-CSF did not alter the self-renewal capacity, cellular phenotype, and morphology of colony cells, indicating that the direction and degree of differentiation of L-CFU stimulated by rGM-CSF or rG-CSF were not different from those stimulated with PHA-LCM.
AuthorsT Motoji, M Takanashi, M Fuchinoue, M Masuda, K Oshimi, H Mizoguchi
JournalExperimental hematology (Exp Hematol) Vol. 17 Issue 1 Pg. 56-60 (Jan 1989) ISSN: 0301-472X [Print] Netherlands
PMID2783249 (Publication Type: Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't)
Chemical References
  • Colony-Stimulating Factors
  • Lymphokines
  • Recombinant Proteins
Topics
  • Colony-Stimulating Factors (pharmacology)
  • Granulocytes
  • Hematopoietic Stem Cells (drug effects, pathology)
  • Humans
  • Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute (pathology)
  • Lymphokines (pharmacology)
  • Macrophages
  • Neoplastic Stem Cells (drug effects, pathology)
  • Phenotype
  • Recombinant Proteins (pharmacology)
  • Tumor Stem Cell Assay

Join CureHunter, for free Research Interface BASIC access!

Take advantage of free CureHunter research engine access to explore the best drug and treatment options for any disease. Find out why thousands of doctors, pharma researchers and patient activists around the world use CureHunter every day.
Realize the full power of the drug-disease research graph!


Choose Username:
Email:
Password:
Verify Password:
Enter Code Shown: